Data quality framework

Bad data discovered only when a report looked wrong.

Problem

Bad data discovered only when a report looked wrong.

Approach

Designed, developed, and implemented a Snowflake-based data quality framework for an energy operator's critical reporting views, surfaced through Sigma dashboards. Instead of discovering bad data when a report looks wrong, stakeholders get continuous visibility: rule-based checks running over the reporting layer, with results tracked and trended on dashboards the business actually opens. Worked with stakeholders through requirements, validation, and adoption - because a DQ framework nobody checks is just compute cost.

Architecture

Reporting views Snowflake DQ rule engine scheduled checks Sigma dashboards trended results

Data quality as a product, not a project

One-off data audits decay immediately. This framework treats quality as continuously measured: define rules where the business feels pain, run them on schedule, trend the results, and make ownership visible. The dashboard is the accountability mechanism - when a critical view degrades, it's seen the same day, not at month-end close.

Stack

Have a similar problem? Let's catch up →